evaluation: added introduction text and made plan for additional text
Some checks are pending
CI / Julia ${{ matrix.version }} - ${{ matrix.os }} - ${{ matrix.arch }} - ${{ github.event_name }} (x64, ubuntu-latest, 1.10) (push) Waiting to run
CI / Julia ${{ matrix.version }} - ${{ matrix.os }} - ${{ matrix.arch }} - ${{ github.event_name }} (x64, ubuntu-latest, 1.6) (push) Waiting to run
CI / Julia ${{ matrix.version }} - ${{ matrix.os }} - ${{ matrix.arch }} - ${{ github.event_name }} (x64, ubuntu-latest, pre) (push) Waiting to run

This commit is contained in:
Daniel 2025-04-12 16:22:14 +02:00
parent 101ccef67b
commit 4c60331288
2 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -1,9 +1,14 @@
\chapter{Evaluation}
\label{cha:evaluation}
The aim of this thesis is to determine whether at least one of the GPU evaluators is faster than the current CPU evaluator. This chapter describes the performance evaluation. First, the environment in which the performance tests are performed is explained. Then the individual results for the GPU interpreter and the transpiler are presented. In addition, this part also includes the performance tuning steps taken to achieve these results. Finally, the results of the GPU evaluators are compared to the CPU evaluator in order to answer the research questions of this thesis.
\section{Test environment}
Explain the hardware used, as well as the actual data (how many expressions, variables etc.)
three scenarios -> few, normal and many variable sets;; expr repetitions to simulate parameter optimisation
Benchmarktools.jl -> 1000 samples per scenario
\section{Results}
talk about what we will see now (results only for interpreter, then transpiler and then compared with each other and a CPU interpreter)

Binary file not shown.